Key Takeaways:
- The IMF now recognizes cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin in its economic data standards as non-produced assets.
- Including such data will increase transparency and provide a broader picture of the financial activity taking place around the world.
- It highlights the growing importance of digital assets in the global economy and their potential to reshape financial systems.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has made a historic move by formally incorporating cryptocurrencies into its global economic data systems. It is a significant step in redefining how the world’s financial health is measured, recognizing the growing role that digital currencies play in the global economy. The new standards are provided in the seventh edition of the IMF’s Balance of Payments Manual (BPM7), released on March 20, 2025, and represent the first time the IMF has offered detailed guidance to the international statistical community on how to capture digital asset activity in its global statistical standards.
Table of Contents
The IMF’s New Framework for Classifying Crypto Assets
The new IMF standards offer a framework to help countries consistently monitor and report on crypto activity. One such distinguishing feature in the BPM7 is the classification of digital assets. The framework distinguishes between fungible and non-fungible tokens and categorizes them based on the liabilities they incur. The framework has been developed with input from 160 countries. This illustrates the importance of identifying the worldwide impact of digital assets on an economy, even if the implementations may vary.
- Bitcoin (BTC-USD) and Other Similar Cryptocurrencies: Included as “non-produced, non-financial assets” that are not generated through standard production efforts and are instead assigned as stores of value rather than financial instruments and recorded separately under the capital account.
- Liability-Backed Stablecoins: Because they represent a claim against the issuer, they are classified as “financial instruments” falling under the purview of financial regulations.
- Platform Tokens (e.g., Ethereum, Solana): Classified as “equity-like holdings” in the financial account — recognizing their potential stake in a network or ecosystem.
For instance, the IMF would treat a UK investor holding US-issued Solana tokens similarly to owning foreign stocks. In fact, as the IMF has noted, those types of assets have properties akin to ordinary equity- with respect to ownership rights – even if they are cryptographically secured. This is a huge step forward to harmonize the reporting of digital assets — and make economic statistics more consistent and comparable in the world.
Keeping Track of Crypto Transactions and Staking Rewards Based on IMF Regulations
The practical upshots of the new IMF classifications are not trivial. For example, cross-border transactions in Bitcoin will now be recorded in the capital account as acquisitions or disposals of non-produced assets. Such granularity paints a better picture of capital flows and the absorption of cryptocurrency into the global financial system.
To add to the complexity, the IMF recognizes staking and crypto yields. Rewards from holding tokens, they argue, are akin to dividends on equity, and as such should be reported as income depending on the size and purpose of the holdings. The IMF considers activities such as mining and staking—processes that secure and validate crypto transactions—as services. These will form a part of the computer services exports and imports.
The IMF’s Embrace of Crypto: Implications for Regulation and Adoption
IMF official recognition of crypto in its dataset signifies the fact that the world’s financial institutions can not turn a blind eye to digital assets any longer. There is also a growing realization that these assets must be included in economic policy and regulation.
“It’s about making sure we’re putting the right frameworks in place to understand how crypto will affect the global economy,” a senior IMF official said. They emphasized that the intention here is not to promote or discourage the use of cryptocurrency, but rather to create as clear and consistent a way as possible to measure and study its effects.
The IMF recognizes these challenges and this acknowledgment can drive the harmonization of regulations cross-border. This enables governments to better formulate policies on taxation of cryptocurrency, anti-money laundering, and consumer protection.
One of the biggest challenges in the crypto space has been the lack of regulatory clarity. The work that the IMF does may help promote such an environment, which could in turn lead more institutions to embrace cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology.
IMF Digital Asset Guidelines: A Potential for Transparency
It also enhances the transparency of cryptocurrencies in the IMF’s standards, which has a significant impact. Imagine a scenario where, in the near future, a small island nation experiences a crypto boom. With the IMF’s standards in place, the national economy will be better prepared to recognize and mitigate risks.
The IMF’s manual represents a major shift in the way global economic statistics are collected and interpreted, paving the way for future guidelines on digital currencies.
