Michael Saylor Calls on U.S. Gov’t to Purchase 25% of BTC Supply

Số người xem bài viết (Post Views): 13

Key Takeaways:

Michael Saylor proposes the U.S. government should acquire 25% of the total Bitcoin supply.
They’d like to get trillions of dollars in revenue so they can fund the future of America.
Critics warn of volatility, security risks and political backlash.

Michael Saylor, a key voice in the Bitcoin community, whose company has been vocally acquiring Bitcoin since 2020 as Executive Chairman (previously MicroStrategy), has sparked intense debate with a bold proposition that the United States government ought to lock up a jaw-dropping 25% of the total supply of Bitcoin (BTC) over the coming decade. Unveiled at the White House Crypto Summit on March 7, 2025, this bold plan has ignited conversations about the future of Bitcoin and the proper scope of government intervention in the growing cryptocurrency sector.

Table of Contents

What Is Saylor’s Vision About?

Saylor’s plan, which he laid out in his document “A Digital Assets Strategy to Dominate the 21st Century Global Economy,” proposes that the U.S. government “acquire 5-25% of the Bitcoin network in trust for the nation through consistent, programmatic daily purchases between 2025 and 2035, when 99% of all BTC will have been issued.” This Saylor X post can also be viewed at:

https://twitter.com/saylor/status/1898136271131758895

Saylor firmly believes in a “Never Sell Your Bitcoin” paradigm and what will come out by 2045 is a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve that earns more than 10 trillion dollars a year, ensuring long-term financial benefits for the American people. Saylor estimates this reserve could contribute between $16 trillion and $81 trillion to the U.S. Treasury by 2045, potentially alleviating the national debt.

How Does This Work Compared to Other Bitcoin Proposals?

Saylor’s vision surpasses previous Bitcoin acquisition proposals. For example, once upon a time, there was the 2024 Bitcoin Act of Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis (July 2024), which sought to purchase 1 million BTC (about 5% of the total supply). An effective 25% stake would amount to a staggering 5.25 million BTC.

Table: Comparing Bitcoin Acquisition Proposals

Proposal	BTC Quantity	% of Total Supply	Proponent
Lummis’s Bitcoin Act	1 Million BTC	5%	Senator Lummis
Saylor’s Proposal	5.25 Million BTC	25%	Michael Saylor

El Salvador: An Example — but at a Smaller Scale

As an example of a country utilizing cryptocurrency, El Salvador adopted Bitcoin as legal tender in 2021. Notably, the decision — despite controversy surrounding it — did recognize Bitcoin on a global platform. Saylor’s proposal may resemble El Salvador’s Bitcoin adoption strategy, but this time, it would be backed by the financial and political influence of a global superpower like the United States.

How Will the U.S. Economy Be Affected?

Saylor’s plan, if enacted, could have serious consequences for the US economy:

Mining Benefits & More Revenue for the Government: According to Saylor, a reserve can generate trillions of dollars in future revenue.
Increased Financial Stability: Bitcoin could serve as reserve asset enabling the U.S. to protect itself from inflation and economic recession.
Increased Innovation: Government participation in the Bitcoin market has the potential to motivate innovation and development in the digital asset space.

The Economic and Political Implications

This is not just a straightforward money transfer. Of course, if US Government holds a considerable amount of Bitcoin, it can have a significant impact on the value and stability of cryptocurrency. It could also cement the U.S.’s status as a digital asset leader. This move could position the U.S. as a leader in digital assets.

Understanding the Risks and Challenges

Such an ambitious plan comes with its own set of challenges:

Price Volatility: Bitcoin’s well-known volatility could cause drastic changes in the value of the reserve.
Security Risks: Vulnerabilities associated with the storage of large amounts of Bitcoin must be addressed through stringent security protocols to protect against hacking and theft.
Political Opposition: Some investors may be cautious of government investments in Bitcoin, due to a lack of faith in cryptocurrency. Others may view it as the US losing confidence in their dollar and the conventional financial market.

Cases of Bitcoin Volatility in the Real World

The price swings of Bitcoin are well-known. For example, Bitcoin surged to nearly $20,000 in 2017 before plummeting to around $3,000 in 2018. Bitcoin peaked above $69,000 before experiencing a sharp correction in the following months. These few examples highlight the existential risk of holding Bitcoin as a reserve asset.

Security Breach Example

In one of the largest crypto breaches flashed on a public stage, Mt. Gox, the then-largest Bitcoin exchange went bankrupt in 2014 after 850,000 Bitcoins were lost valued at $450 million at that time. This is a strong sign as to why safeguarding such a significant investment will be vitally important.

What About Debanking?

Bitcoin’s legal status in the U.S. remains uncertain. While the government recognizes Bitcoin as property, banks still have the authority to deny services to Bitcoin-related businesses. This act of debanking is incredibly damaging as it puts legitimate businesses in a position to battle uphill.

Conclusion: A Paradigm Shift in Question

A Visionary Idea — 25% of Bitcoin Supply for the U.S. Government? At the same time, while there are still unanswered questions and valid concerns, Michael Saylor’s proposal underscores the increasing acceptance of Bitcoin as a strategic asset. Ultimately, whatever decision will need to weigh carefully the potential risks and benefits in the context of the political and economic environment at the time. It feels like a game of vision versus a roll of the dice, and only time will tell how the chips fall. That’s not something to be taken lightly!